Appassionato

Jump to Footer

Pages

Site Love

Search


Oh ho! “Professionals”

Navigation-wise, what is a menu? More spe­cific­ally, is this a menu? As far as I can see, it provides a selection of available options. If you disable CSS, it’s organised into a list of options. But oh no, for design elitists who favour solid, stubborn, Web 2.0-style designs and can’t see anything else through their little eyes, menus must be organised in the same way as all the other “clean and simple” designs out there. By some com­ment­at­ors on this article I dugg, it’s not a menu. Please enlighten me then, what’s the new defin­i­tion of a “menu”?

Is HTML/CSS coding then?

You have designers, front-enders and pro­gram­mers. A designer shouldn’t HTML, a front-ender shouldn’t write code and a pro­gram­mer shouldn’t design. The reverse is also true, a pro­gram­mer shouldn’t need to worry about front-ending, a front-ender shouldn’t be designing and a designer shouldn’t write code.

Some people can combine 2 or 3, but that’s rarely a good com­bin­a­tion, or only a good com­bin­a­tion in their mind and the minds of equally retarded peers. In con­clu­sion, pro­fes­sion­als spe­cial­ize them­selves and don’t do things below (or above) their paycheck.

Ah, I see. No, that was sarcasm. I don’t see. I don’t see at all why pro­gram­mers do not need to worry about how users at the front-end are going to use their software. Are you coding shit for your own back-end use? Would you be more happy hiring a pro­gram­mer, a front-ender and a designer for a project, or would you like to hire someone who can do all of that just as well if not better than three specialists?

I’m sad. Because while an economist is a pro­fes­sional and a lawyer is a pro­fes­sional, I’m wanting to be an com­mer­cial (economics) lawyer. That’s just wow, “only a good com­bin­a­tion in [my] mind and the minds of equally retarded peers.” I’m not really sad, cause I think I just quoted a retard.

Con­tinu­ing on from the same person…

That said, the article in this Digg-post is neither advanced nor “coding” – it’s HTML and CSS.. the basics, really, of anyone pro­fes­sional enough to bother working with pro­fes­sional people. The MVC-idea if you will, Model, View, Control. But most people here aren’t pro­fes­sion­als I suppose, so.. sorry for sounding “elitist” (not intended that way), but if you consider this example “advanced coding”.. well.. you’re not that experienced.

I agree with part of that. To me, it’s not “advanced coding”, even though it may well be for some. But totally denying that HTML and CSS are “coding”… Well, what are they then? They’re just… HTML and… CSS. Right.

And for all that time, I’ve been referring to HTML and CSS as coding! Well, since I’m neither a pro­fes­sional in design nor coding, I don’t need to change my terms for an egghead of a “professional”.


Leave a reply

If this is your first time commenting here, your comment will be put into moderation.
HTML tags allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .